CRA harmonized standards and the presumption of conformity

Understand how the horizontal standards (EN 40000‑1‑x family) relate to the presumption of conformity under the CRA Regulation (EU) 2024/2847, what the pathway looks like, and what to do while harmonized standards are still being finalized.

Note: The relevance for (also) meeting harmonized product verticals for the presumption of conformity will be addressed in a later article. For now, the focus is only on the harmonized horizontal family EN 40000-1-x.

DISCLAIMER: At the time of writing, no harmonized standards for the CRA are cited in the Official Journal. This article is based on draft insights that I’ve collected from various sources. This is not in any way to be seen as legal advice.

CRA and harmonized standards

The CRA is the legal baseline. Harmonized standards — once cited in the Official Journal of the EU (OJEU) — are the practical mechanism that gives manufacturers a presumption of conformity with the CRA’s essential cybersecurity requirements.

Products with digital elements and processes put in place by the manufacturer which are in conformity with harmonised standards or parts thereof, the references of which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be presumed to be in conformity with the essential cybersecurity requirements set out in Annex I covered by those standards or parts thereof.

CRA Article 27

Legal mechanics: how harmonized standards create presumption of conformity

Under the New Legislative Framework model embedded in the CRA, the Regulation sets essential requirements. Harmonized standards provide technical specifications that, if applied, allow a manufacturer to claim a presumption that those essential requirements are met. The chain is simple in principle:

Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)

The Path to Presumption of Conformity

Legislative Foundation

CRA sets essential requirements defined in Annex I and related Articles.

1
2

Technical Standards

Standards bodies (CEN/CENELEC/ETSI) develop standards that map to those requirements (the EN 40000‑1‑x family is the horizontal set intended to cover generic cybersecurity requirements for products with digital elements).

Harmonization

The Commission cites specific standards in the Official Journal (OJEU) to trigger legal harmonization.

3
4

Presumption of Conformity

Once cited in the OJEU, a manufacturer that applies the cited standard(s) in full can rely on a presumption of conformity for the aspects covered by those standards — simplifying conformity assessment and market surveillance interactions.

NOTE: That presumption is limited to the scope and clauses of the cited standard(s). If a product’s risk profile or intended use falls outside the standard’s scope, or the manufacturer deviates from the standard, the presumption does not apply.

What the EN 40000-1-x family is intended to do

The EN 40000‑1‑x series is being developed as a horizontal (product‑agnostic) set of standards to translate CRA Annex I requirements into implementable technical measures, testable criteria, and documentation practices. 

EN 40000 Series: Horizontal Harmonized Standards for CRA

CEN / CENELEC JTC 13 Mandate M/606

EN 40000-1-1 Vocabulary

Shared terminology for all CRA standards

30 August 2026

EN 40000-1-2 Cyber Resilience Principles (PT1)

Risk-based lifecycle processes (CRA Annex I Part I(1))

30 August 2026

EN 40000-1-3 Vulnerability Handling (PT3)

CRA Annex I Part II (CVD, SBOM, updates, disclosure)

30 August 2026

EN 40000-1-4 Security Requirements (PT2)

Maps CRA Annex I Part I (2)(a-m) to security objectives

30 October 2027

TR 40000 1-5 Threats & Objectives

Common threat catalogue & objective framework

30 August 2026
NOTE: Mid-April 2026, no standards are cited yet. Dates might change.

While standards are not yet cited: do not wait to act

Assuming that you’re able to access the draft EN 40000-1-x, treat these and related technical documents as best‑practice blueprints. Implement their measures where feasible to reduce risk and be ready to claim the presumption once a citation occurs.

Maintain robust technical documentation (Article 31) and a living cybersecurity risk assessment . These are mandatory irrespective of harmonized standards.

Also, prepare SBOM processes, vulnerability‑handling workflows, and update/versioning policies now — these are core CRA obligations and will be central to any harmonized standard clauses.

Act — do not wait!

CRA
1

Portfolio Mapping

Map product portfolios to the CRA definitions and identify which EN 40000‑1‑x parts will be most relevant.

2

Adopt Clauses

Adopt draft standard clauses into development and QA pipelines now.

3

Document

Strengthen documentation: technical files, SBOMs, and logs.

4

Conformity Routes

Decide which conformity module you will use and prepare evidence.

5

Monitor OJEU

Monitor OJEU for the implementing decision; update declarations immediately.

When standards are cited

If you have already implemented the standard clauses, you will be able to rely on the presumption of conformity for the covered aspects — this simplifies market surveillance interactions and reduces the evidentiary burden. If you deviate from the standard, document the deviation and the compensating measures; the presumption will not apply to deviated clauses.

From the point of view of notified bodies and market surveillance authorities, the harmonized standards will provide a common technical yardstick, reducing interpretation variance and enabling more consistent assessments across Member States in the EU.

Wrap-up

Harmonized standards are the bridge between legal requirements and technical practice. The EN 40000‑1‑x family is designed to be that bridge for the CRA, but the legal effect — the presumption of conformity — only arrives with OJEU citation. For now, treat the standards as the authoritative technical roadmap: implement, document, and be ready to convert that technical work into a legal presumption as soon as the Commission cites the standards.

Finally, as mentioned at the start, for products classified as “Important” or “Critical”, meeting the harmonized horizontal standards is not enough to gain the presumption of conformity. I’ll return to harmonized product verticals in a later article.

Graphics created with AI-support